Cases 71 - 80 of 274
Gomez v. Metro Police et al
as 2:2019cv00108
Defendant:
Flamingo Heights Association, Metro Police, Geico and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Alejandro Gomez
Jose Gomez-Fernandez v. William Barr
as 19-70079
Petitioner:
JOSE CARMEN GOMEZ-FERNANDEZ, AKA Jobe Carmen Gomez, AKA Jose Carmen Gomez, AKA Jose Gomez Carmen
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Diaz v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14119
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Eliseo Gomez-Diaz and Jose Eliseo Gomez Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv06900
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AZCONA v. GOMEZ et al
as 3:2018cv16767
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
P.O. JOSE M. GOMEZ, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT and P.O. RIEPENHOFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arreguin et al v. Sanchez
as 2:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jose Gomez Lopez, Jose Lopez Gomez, Miguel Sanchez Cervantes and others
Defendant:
Manuel Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jose Ortiz Gomez, Jr. v. Nancy Berryhill
as 2:2018cv07305
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortiz Gomez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gomez Basurto et al v. TSG 89 Corp et al
as 1:2018cv06827
Defendant:
George Santis, Ari Doe, TSG 89 Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Gomez Basurto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jose Carranza-Gomez v. Jeffrey Uttecht, et al
as 18-35341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE CARRANZA-GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, Superintendent, HANARATTY, John Doe, Lt., MARIA FERNANDEZ, Corrections Officer and others
United States of America v. Gomez et al
as 2:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose P Gomez, Maria Gomez and Commercial Collection Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
