Cases 71 - 80 of 273
United States of America v. Mustafa
as 19-2520
Defendant:
Earnest James Ujaama, AKA James Ujaama, AKA Bilal Ahmed, AKA James Earnest Thompson, AKA Abu Sumaya, AKA Abdul Qaadir, Haroon Rashid Aswat, AKA Haroon, AKA Haroon Aswat, Aswat Haroon Rashid and Oussama Kassir, AKA Abu Abdullah, AKA Abu Khadija
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mustafa Kamel Mustafa
Lu v. Kamel
as 1:2019cv11681
Defendant:
Ziad Kamel
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Kamel et al
as 6:2019cv06089
Defendant:
Dr. Hosam Kamel and Brendalyn Jacob
Plaintiff:
Henry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Kamel Elburki
as 19-2391
Defendant / Appellant:
Kamel Elburki
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
RAMIC v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2019cv03670
Defendant:
Thomas Cioppa, Acting Commissioner Kevin K. McAleenan and Acting Director of F David Bowdich
Plaintiff:
KAMEL RAMIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Selim et al v. Denver County District Court
as 1:2019cv00925
Plaintiff:
Saad Kamel Ally and Nagwa Mohamed Selim
Defendant:
Denver County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamel v. Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits of North Carolina, LLC
as 1:2019mc21124
Defendant:
Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits of North Carolina, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ayman Kamel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cordon v. McCoy et al
as 1:2019cv00037
Defendant:
Tamarcus Jerod Porter, LKM Trust and LeShawn Kamel McCoy
Plaintiff:
Delicia Cordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAJOR v. KAMEL et al
as 2:2018cv16960
Defendant:
NABIL KAMEL, CITY OF PATERSON, EUDY RAMOS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06965
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
