Cases 71 - 80 of 183
RIVERA v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv03117
Defendant:
KONE, INC. and OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hines, Jr. v. Riverwalk Marketplace New Orleans, LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv06741
Plaintiff:
James Hines, Jr
Defendant:
Riverwalk Marketplace New Orleans, LLC , Kone Inc. , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leers v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00449
Plaintiff:
Jody Leers
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and Kone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thomas v. JC Penney Corporation Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Thomas
Defendant:
JC Penney Corporation Inc , North Town Mall LLC , KONE Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
National Elevator Bargaining Association et al v. International Union of Elevator Constructors et al
as 4:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
National Elevator Bargaining Association and KONE, Inc.
Defendant:
International Union of Elevator Constructors and Local Union No. 33
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tilchen v. CEMD Elevator Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Steven Tilchen
Defendant:
CEMD Elevator Corp., Kone Inc. and Mitchell Hellman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GRIFFIN-LEE v. KONE, INC.
as 1:2016cv03017
Plaintiff:
SHERRY GRIFFIN-LEE
Defendant:
KONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vehrencamp v. KONE Inc.
as 3:2016cv05819
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Vehrencamp
Defendant:
KONE Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
