Cases 71 - 80 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ken Letourneau v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2012cv05879
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown Claiming, Does, NDEx West LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Letourneau
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Letourneau v. Avant et al
as 1:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Devon Letourneau
Defendant:
Angelo Avant, William Dwyer, Peter F. Kilmartin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foulk v. Upton et al
as 3:2012cv00400
Defendant:
Andrew R. Erwin, Donald R. Letourneau, Robert J. Loveland and others
Plaintiff:
William G. Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stephens et al v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2012cv00171
Defendant:
Dr. Juile Andrews, John Barker, Rex Burkholder and others
Plaintiff:
Karellen Stephens, Qadira Stephens and Renee Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Renee Stephens v. State of Oregon, et al
as 11-35971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENEE STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, by and through its Judicial Department, DONALD R. LETOURNEAU, Judge, RICK T. HASELTON, Judge and others
Davis et al v. Funke et al
as 5:2011cv01376
Plaintiff:
Darryl Davis , Cynthia Factory and Harold Factory
Defendant:
Larry Funke and Letourneau Technologies Drilling Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Letourneau et al
as 2:2011cv02808
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
D. Letourneau and J. Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Letourneau v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2011cv13162
Plaintiff:
Hannah Letourneau
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Schering Pharma A G, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
