Cases 71 - 80 of 914
Smith, Antonio v. Peters, Eric et al
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Antonio Marques Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Eric Peters, Larry Fuchs, Ryan Blount and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06596
Plaintiff:
MARQUES JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Marques Howard
as 23-10882
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUES DEANGELO HOWARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Tavron v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
M Jackson, III, C Johnson, J Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City Of La Marque et al
as 3:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Adrian Jones and Ryan Jones
Defendant:
City Of La Marque, Jose Santos, Kirk Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv14289
Plaintiff:
Marqus Hines
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pittman v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv14321
Plaintiff:
Marques Pittman
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neal v. Lovett, et al
as 23-1033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
LOVETT, Warden, M. STARR, Wardeh, DEANTON, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
