Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Garrett v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2010cv13577
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett
Defendant:
Wayne, County of and John Doe
Stanfill v. AEDEC International Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00255
Plaintiff:
Raymond D Stanfill
Defendant:
AEDEC International Inc, Cullen Talton, David Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garrett v. State of Michigan, People of
as 2:2010cv10959
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett
Defendant:
State of Michigan, People of
Tsosie v. Garrett et al
as 5:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Tsosie
Defendant:
Michael Garrett and FNU Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Colony Insurance Company v. National Relocation Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03203
Plaintiff:
Colony Insurance Company and Colony Insurance Company
Defendant:
National Relocation Services, Inc., Michael Garrett and DOES
Intervenor:
Fremont General Corporation and Fremont General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Joseph Faulkner v. Robert Cooper, Jr., et al
as 09-5101
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH FAULKNER
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR. and MICHAEL GARRETT, Warden of FCI-Peterson
Fandrich et al v. Raemisch et al
as 3:2008cv00726
Plaintiff:
Larry Fandrich, Alan Schambow, Rich Schumacher and others
Defendant:
Richard Raemisch, Matt Frank, Catherine Farrey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herrera-Cubias v. Garrett et al
as 4:2008cv00517
Plaintiff:
Jose Herrera-Cubias
Defendant:
Michael Garrett, Unknown Physician Assistant, Ricardo E. Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clayton Caves v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 08-3103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAYTON B. CAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, TRACY JOHNS, MICHAEL GARRETT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
