Cases 71 - 80 of 157
Hunter v. Lopez et al
as 6:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Capt. Lopez, Lt. Nutt, Sgt. Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAURY v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00172
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HUNTER HAURY
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Juarez v. Queen Furniture et al
as 1:2017cv01550
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Juarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Queen Furniture, Motor City GMC Buick, Michael Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAURY v. LOTZ
as 1:2017cv02544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUNTER HAURY
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN LOTZ
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02141
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Hunter and Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calendar Research LLC v. StubHub, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04062
Defendant:
Michael Hunter Gray, Lisa Dusseault, Ebay Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Calendar Research LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Hunter v. Parnell et al
as 5:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell and Daniel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Chrysalis Health et al
as 1:2017cv20621
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Chrysalis Health, Harbor House Supportive Housing and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Lovett et al
as 2:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hunter
Defendant:
FNU Lovett, FNU Anderson, FNU Stahling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. LOVETT et al
as 4:2016cv00786
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL HUNTER
Defendant:
LOVETT, ANDERSON, STAHLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
