Cases 71 - 80 of 3,992
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mejia v. Ruquet et al
as 7:2024cv05603
Defendant:
Lt. John Doe 1, CO Mays, Sgt. John Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Dionis Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henriquez-Mejia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4460
Petitioner:
ROSA ADELA FIGUEROA-HENRIQUEZ and DALIA MARLENIS HENRIQUEZ-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
MEJIA MARTE et al v. CHANG
as 1:2024cv07851
Defendant:
APRIL CHANG
Plaintiff:
KARLA BARRALAGA and VICTOR MEJIA MARTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Mejia-Martich et al v. U.S Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv05418
Defendant:
U.S Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth Genalo and Alejandro Mayorkas
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Mejia-Martich and Steve R. Dilone Frias
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rosario-Mejia v. Garland
as 24-1931
Petitioner:
FERNANDO ROSARIO-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
LUCAS v. FRANCISCO et al
as 3:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Eddie Curtis Lucas, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Pipenbrink and Mejia Francisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Briana Mejia et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05921
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Mendoza, Yannick Minniti, Briana Mejia and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, LLC, Chiquita Canyon, Inc. and Waste Connections US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Torts to Land
Mejia-Sosa v. Garland
as 24-1901
Petitioner:
DYLAN JOSELUIS VILLEDA-MEJIA and KATHERINE VANESSA MEJIA-SOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
