Cases 71 - 80 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4268
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nethery v. St. Joseph Health Center et al
as 4:2013cv01243
Plaintiff:
Randall L. Nethery
Defendant:
St. Joseph Health Center, Deborah J. Lampin, Kent Fanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAWLEY v. HILL et al
as 2:2013cv03400
Plaintiff:
HOSEA BRAWLEY
Defendant:
ANTHONY HILL, MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES H. RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeMars-Evans v. Mikron Digital Imaging-Midwest, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01179
Defendant:
Mikron Digital Imaging-Midwest, Inc. and Michael Harvey
Plaintiff:
Patrice DeMars-Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Ratley v. Harley Marine Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Ratley and Michael Harvey
Defendant:
Harley Marine Services, Inc. and Harley Marine Gulf, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Harvey
as 3:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danny Michael Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harvey v. High-Tech Institute
as 4:2011cv00850
Plaintiff:
Michael Harvey
Defendant:
High-Tech Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANTONELLI et al v. ELECTRIC BOAT CORP
as 2:2011cv66269
Plaintiff:
DIANE ANTONELLI and MICHAEL HARVEY
Defendant:
ELECTRIC BOAT CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harvey v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2010cv02235
Petitioner:
Michael Harvey
Respondent:
F Gonzales and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey et al v. Ross Dress For Less, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00612
Plaintiff:
Radha Harvey and Michael Harvey
Defendant:
Ross Dress For Less, Inc. , Doe Persons 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
