Cases 71 - 80 of 192
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06266
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gearing et al v. City of Half Moon Bay
as 3:2021cv01802
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gearing and Mr. Thomas Gearing
Defendant:
City of Half Moon Bay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine v. United States of America et al
as 4:2021cv00300
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas J Devine and Thomas Devine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06060
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BALLERING v. MORGAN STANLEY LLC et al
as 2:2020cv19964
Defendant:
MR. STEPHEN J LUCZO, MR. HUTHAM S OLAYAN, MR. JOSEPH MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2020cv03428
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas J. Cortazzo, Debra Dave, Darryl M Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilbert et al v. Cortazzo et al
as 2:2020xc03430
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas J. Cortazzo, Debra Dave, Darryl M Gilbert and others
Not Classified By Court:
Dwight A. Gilbert
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BALLERING v. MORGAN STANLEY LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06203
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE, MR. JOSEPH MILLER, MR. ROBERT H. HERZ and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bazile v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv01819
Respondent:
Mr. Thomas Feely, Mr. William Barr, Mr. Jeffrey Searls and others
Petitioner:
Stanley Bazile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00527
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage, Mr. Joseph Miller, Mr. Robert H. Herz and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
