Cases 71 - 80 of 491
POULSON v. PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS et al
as 1:2022cv05196
Plaintiff:
ALLISON POULSON
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS and Frito-Lay, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
ELLIS et al v. PEPSICO, INC.
as 7:2022cv05200
Plaintiff:
Tracy Ellis
Defendant:
Pepsico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
PURNELL v. PEPSICO INC et al
as 7:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Brendan Purnell
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC., Target Corporate Services, Inc., PEPSICO INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
White v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02066
Plaintiff:
Donedward White
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ricardo Vidaud et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02713
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Vidaud and John Archibeque
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Irving-Millentree v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Robney Irving-Millentree
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Parrish v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Thomas Parrish
Defendant:
Frito-Lay North America, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitchell v. Pepsico, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kennetha Mitchell
Defendant:
Pepsico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
POULSON v. PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS et al
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
ALLISON POULSON
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC., FRITO-LAY, INC. and PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
