Cases 71 - 80 of 517
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jay Underhill v. Barbara Hanson, et al
as 21-3687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay L. Underhill
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Barbara R. Hanson, Ottertail, Michael A. Rapp, Clay County Probation, Richard Almquist, Parkers Prairie and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 sh
RAPP v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2021cv19095
Plaintiff:
JEREMY RAPP
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rapp et al v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 3:2021cv05800
Plaintiff:
John Rapp, Megan F Wabnitz and Judith Rapp
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Kitsap County, Gary Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rapp v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv02772
Plaintiff:
Ted Rapp
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAPP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40701
Plaintiff:
RONALD P RAPP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vishno v. Maui's Best Downhill LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Randi Cheryl Vishno and Jeremy Gordon Vishno
Defendant:
Maui's Best Downhill LLC, John Does 1-5, John Doe Corporations 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
RAPP v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2021cv03669
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RAPP
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
