Cases 71 - 80 of 87
RIVERA v. BALLY'S PARK PLACE
as 2:2011cv01978
Plaintiff:
RICARDO RIVERA
Defendant:
BALLY'S PARK PLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rivera v. Uribe et al
as 3:2010cv02245
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Rivera
Defendant:
D Uribe, James Napolitano and Able Zamora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Velez (Williams)
as 10-2716
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmen Velez, AKA Edrik, Wilberto Huertas, AKA Tito, Richard Crespo, AKA Richie and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rodney Williams, AKA Rod
Hook v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05036
Plaintiff:
William Hook
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Police Department, Ricardo Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnaldo Pinto et al v. The Walt Disney Company et al
as 8:2010cv00184
Defendant:
AFL CIO, AFL CIO, AFL CIO and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Enriquez Acero, Juan C Guzman, Arnaldo Pinto and others
Ricardo Reyes v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 09-56953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO RIVERA REYES, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
CITY OF GLENDALE, GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF MEDERA and others
Real-party-in-interest:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
US v. Rivera-Rivera
as 09-2527
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
RICARDO RIVERA-RIVERA, a/k/a Chino
Interested Party:
DORAL FINANCE CORP.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mercado v. COSVI et al
as 3:2009cv01298
Plaintiff:
Arcadio M Mercado
Defendant:
COSVI and RICARDO RIVERA-CARDONA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ricardo Rivera v. Michael Smelosky
as 09-55426
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO RIVERA
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. SMELOSKY, Warden, Centinela State Prison, State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
