Cases 71 - 80 of 535
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Johnson v. Maria Imperial
as 22-1733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA L. IMPERIAL, GEICO CORPORATION, STEVEN L. MAURER and others
Johnson et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson and 101 Hands On
Defendant:
Linda Hesch, Quality Assurance & Monitoring Unit, The State Education Department The University of the State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Johnson v. Hartford Medical Bill Processing Center, et al
as 22-5910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HARTFORD MEDICAL BILL PROCESSING CENTER, NORTHERN LIGHTS CHIROPRACTIC, REBECCA KESHMIRI and others
Johnson v. Rodeway Inn Syracuse
as 22-1489
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Rodeway Inn Syracuse, Pro Se Corporation, Choice Hotels International Inc., Pro Se Corporation, Commissioner Teresa Gaffney, Pro Se Govt. Employee and others
Johnson v. Rodeway Inn Syracuse
as 22-1774
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Rodeway Inn Syracuse, Pro Se Corporation, Choice Hotels International Inc., Pro Se Corporation, Commissioner Teresa Gaffney, Pro Se Govt. Employee and others
Johnson v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles et al
as 5:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles and Jane Doe
Johnson v. North Central Ohio Rehabilitation Center et al
as 3:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
North Central Ohio Rehabilitation Center, Travis B. Stillion, Inder F. Levesque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
