Cases 71 - 80 of 477
Rover Pipeline LLC et al v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-HA-HL-009.000 et al
as 5:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Russell A. Wylie, Terry A. Wylie, Any Unknown Owners and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mitchell v. Entzel
as 1:2019cv00010
Respondent:
Frederick Entzel
Petitioner:
Russell Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thaxton v. W.V. DOC Commissioner et al
as 2:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Sgt. Slater, John Anderson, Jim Grey and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin C. Thaxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French et al v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01544
Defendant:
William Wesley Williams and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Annamarie K. French and Russell Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medley et al v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Russell E. Medley and Gerri Anne Medley
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Shelton v. Russell et al
as 5:2018cv01492
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc., Jeffrey P. Russell, Landstar System Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lynn Shelton
Interested Party:
Erie Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. South Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2018cv01479
Defendant:
Medical Department and South Central Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Russell W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Macy's Corporate Services, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Macy's Corporate Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Russell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murdock et al v. Gaddy et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Cleo Murdock and Russell Elswick
Defendant:
John Rutherford, Kanawha County Sheriff Office, Christopher David Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petrey v. Muhs et al
as 5:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
Rose Petrey
Defendant:
Aaron Muhs, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
