Cases 71 - 80 of 840
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv22087
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth S Williams
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. State of South Carolina,
as 2:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoang Tran et al v. Williams
as 4:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Thien Tony Hoang Tran and Jay'Den L Kannedy
Defendant:
Jeffrey S Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge
as 23-358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Gillespie Wadsworth, Counselor Mrs. Wiggins, Warden J. C. Holland, Individually and in their official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Shellard, Deputy Hoyt, Deputy Bitterman and others
Williams v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Omar S Williams
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
USA v. Jessica Williams
as 23-1319
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSICA S. WILLIAMS
Stein v. Crutchfield et al
as 2:2023cv02038
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Kevin S. Crutchfield, Richard P. Dealy, Edward C. Dowling, Jr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.