Cases 71 - 80 of 844
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mauer v. ICON Health and Fitness, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv02009
Plaintiff:
Marlene Mauer
Defendant:
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc , Sears, Roebuck and Co and Sears Home Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCallon v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Charles D. McCallon
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Sears Holdings Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Guinyard et al
as 5:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Richard Boyd
Defendant:
Elton Latroy Guinyard , Sears Roebuck and Co and Wolverine World Wide Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Steinmetz v. Sears Roebuck and Co
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hirsh Steinmetz
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
JFJ Toys, Inc., d/b/a D&L Company et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 8:2014cv03527
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation and Sears Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff:
Fred Ramirez, JFJ Toys, Inc. and JFJ Toys, Inc. doing business as D&L Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Abbott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 4:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Annette Abbott
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 3:2017cv11570
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. , KCD IP, LLC and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VISAKAY v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2017cv11570
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. , KCD IP, LLC , STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AIDA VISAKAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Via Port New York LLC v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2017cv01222
Plaintiff:
Via Port New York LLC
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
