Cases 71 - 80 of 952
Metoyer v. Starbucks Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
as 2:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Metoyer
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Recinos et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Lacey Recinos and Oscar Recinos
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Pactiv Packaging, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harrison v. Sdbucks LLC et al
as 8:2023cv04462
Plaintiff:
Dinah Harrison and Dinah Webb
Defendant:
Sdbucks LLC, Powdersville Station LLC, Carolina Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Quintana v. Starbucks Corporation
as 5:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Norma QUINTANA
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leslie v. Starbucks Corporation
as 23-1194
Petitioner / Appellant:
Linda M. Leslie, Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent / Appellee:
Starbucks Corporation
Balmuccino, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 23-35561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BALMUCCINO, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
NLRB v. Starbucks Corporation
as 23-1767
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
