Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Chisholm v. Greenwood County Detention Center
as 2:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Chisholm
Defendant:
Greenwood County Detention Center and Tony Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Davis et al
as 8:2011cv03349
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Moore
Defendant:
Tony Davis and Sharon Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner et al v. Greenwood County et al
as 8:2011cv02557
Plaintiff:
Ruby Faulkner , Sallie Jones , William Faulkner and others
Defendant:
Greenwood County , Greenwood County Sheriff's Office , Tony Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridlehuber v. Greenwood County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2011cv02112
Plaintiff:
Marcia Ridlehuber
Defendant:
Greenwood County Sheriff's Office , Tony Davis , Mitch Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nix v. Reeder et al
as 8:2011cv01379
Plaintiff:
Gerald Nix
Defendant:
J Reeder, Janna A Nelson, Courtney Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Davis et al
as 8:2011cv01311
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Moore
Defendant:
Tony Davis, Lonnie Smith and Captain Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Davis et al
as 8:2011cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Moore
Defendant:
Tony Davis and Lonnie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Tony Davi
as 11-50141
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TONY DAVIS
Davis v. Swarthout
as 2:2010cv03224
Petitioner:
Tony Davis
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steven Lefemine v. Mike Frederick
as 10-2014
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN LEFEMINE, d/b/a Columbia Christians for Life
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKE FREDERICK, individually and in his official capacity
Defendant:
DAN WIDEMAN, individually and in his official capacity, LONNIE SMITH, individually and in his official capacity, BRANDON STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
