Cases 71 - 80 of 488
Perez v. New York Hospital Cornell
as 17-1518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Perez
Defendant - Appellee:
New York Hospital Cornell, Dr. Emie, DARE, its officers and Board Members and others
Gutman v. Yahoo! Inc.
as 1:2017cv03294
Plaintiff:
Amnon Gutman
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Yahoo, Inc.
as 8:2017mc00275
Petitioner:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent:
Yahoo, Inc.
Meyer v. Aabaco Small Business, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv02102
Plaintiff:
Ronald Meyer
Defendant:
Aabaco Small Business, LLC and Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC v. Rakuten Commerce, LLC d/b/a Rakuten.com
as 2:2015cv01730
Consolidated Defendant:
AT&T Corp., Office Depot, Inc., Evite, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Buy.com Inc. d/b/a Rakuten.com, Tumblr, Inc. and Rakuten Commerce, LLC d/b/a Rakuten.com
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom
Plaintiff:
CryptoPeak Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HE et al v. YAHOO! INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00635
Defendant:
YAHOO! INC. , MICHAEL CALLAHAN , RONALD BELL and others
Plaintiff:
DEPU HE , ZILI YANG , DAWEI LI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Product Association Technologies LLC v. YAHOO! Inc.
as 2:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Product Association Technologies LLC
Defendant:
YAHOO! Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
TS Patents LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
as 3:2017cv01721
Plaintiff:
TS Patents LLC
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Talukder v. Yahoo! Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01525
Plaintiff:
Nafiz Talukder
Defendant:
Yahoo! Inc., Marissa A. Mayer and Kenneth A. Goldman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
UFCW Local 1500 Pension Fund v. Marissa Mayer, et al
as 17-15435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MARISSA MAYER, DAVID FILO, SUE JAMES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
