Cases 81 - 90 of 70,897
Lee #112795 v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Darrick Devon Lee #112795
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Jake Ellis and Zachary Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Satkowiak et al v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv11229
Plaintiff:
Paul Satkowiak and Prizza Satkowiak
Defendant:
Brian Marshall and Justin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nationwide Recovery, Incorporated, et al v. City of Detroit, MI
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE RECOVERY, INCORPORATED, JULIA HUSSEIN, HUSSEIN M. HUSSEIN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Albert Pickett, Jr., et al v. City of Cleveland, OH
as 24-3395
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHEAST OHIO REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT
New v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
JOELLE NEW
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
