Cases 81 - 90 of 5,879
Cody, II v. Howell et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Cody, II
Defendant:
Marc S. Howell and Harrisburg City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Courtney Smith, et al
as 24-5035
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney L. Smith, Kenneth M. Carpenter, Amanda L. Meredith, Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Grierson, et al.
as 24-851
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. HOWARD
Defendant:
STEVEN D. GRIERSON, TERI BERKSHIRE, KRISTEN BROWN and others
Smith v. Howell, et al.
as 24-857
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH
Respondent:
JERRY HOWELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and RONALD OLIVER, Substituted per [92] Order for Jerry Howell
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Howell v. O'Malley
as 24-1161
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Dodson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01189
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dodson, Nannie Dunbar, Colleen Dunwoody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Howell v. Asous et al
as 0:2024cv60256
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Howell
Defendant:
Milan Asous, Dejarnira Richmond and Eric Strzalkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morales v. Sheddy, et al.
as 24-792
Plaintiff:
YOANDY FERNANDEZ MORALES
Defendant:
SHEDDY, STEVEN, Dr. AGUSTIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
