Cases 81 - 90 of 27,892
Alexander v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00448
Defendant:
Unknown
Plaintiff:
James Alexander, 3rd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gail Clayton v. Alexander Wells
as 24-1611
Defendant:
ALLYSON P. WELLS and ALEXANDER WELLS
Plaintiff:
GAIL H. CLAYTON and THOMAS A. CLAYTON
Singleton v. Schiroh et al
as 3:2024cv00261
Defendant:
Jeremy Alexander, Jeffrey Dean and Bennie Schiroh
Plaintiff:
Brent Wade Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.K., a minor child by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Alexander Kashton v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06212
Defendant:
Nurture, LLC, Hero A.G., Walmart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
S.K., a minor child by and through her Proposed Guardian Ad Litem, Alexander Kashton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Alexander (PS) v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv02431
Defendant:
Michaela Martinez
Plaintiff:
Darrick Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2024cv61631
Defendant:
Alexander Chang, Officer Ryan Cue and City of Hollywood
Plaintiff:
Charles Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Curry, Alexander v. Thorne
as 1:2024cv23386
Defendant:
Aubrey L. Thorne
Plaintiff:
Alexander James Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Keller v. Synchrony Bank
as 2:2024mc00648
Petitioner:
Alexander Keller
Respondent:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Werling, Nicholas v. Goulart, Alexander
as 3:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Alexander David Goulart
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Werling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
