Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00827
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
STEEN et al v. AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv04062
Plaintiff: BARBARA STEEN and DANIEL STEEN
Defendant: AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC., AMF, AMF BOWLING WORLD WORLDWIDE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
Hilbun v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00334
Plaintiff: Sarah Hilbun
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hammer v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00327
Plaintiff: Steven E. Hammer, Steven E. Hammer, Steven E. Hammer and others
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dougherty v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00424
Plaintiff: Dennis Dougherty
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bailey v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00423
Plaintiff: James Bailey
Defendant: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00001
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2007cv01456
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00929
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Magliano v. AMF Bowling Center Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01340
Plaintiff: John A Magliano, Jr
Defendant: AMF Bowling Center Inc and Triangle Bowl Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?