Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon v. City of Union City, Tennessee et al
as 1:2010cv01230
Defendant:
City of Union City, Tennessee and Mike Hogg
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Lee Gordon, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LA BOMBA ATOMICA, INC. et al v. MANSILLA et al
as 2:2010cv03139
Plaintiff:
LA BOMBA ATOMICA, INC. and PEDRO CALDERON
Defendant:
ANA D. MANSILLA, CITY OF UNION CITY, BRIAN P. STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TADROS et al v. CITY OF UNION CITY et al
as 2:2010cv02535
Plaintiff:
ADIP J. TADROS and NORMA TADROS
Defendant:
CITY OF UNION CITY, BRIAN P. STACK, JOHN MEDINA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010mc09013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
City of Atlanta v. South Fulton Municipal, et al
as 10-10710
Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTH FULTON MUNICIPAL REGIONAL WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, CITY OF FAIRBURN, CITY OF PALMETTO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA
City of Atlanta v. City of Fairburn, et al
as 10-10721
Defendant - Appellant:
SOUTH FULTON MUNICIPAL REGIONAL WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, CITY OF UNION CITY, CITY OF FAIRBURN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA
CASTRO v. CITY OF UNION CITY
as 2:2009cv06176
Plaintiff:
ESTABAN CASTRO
Defendant:
CITY OF UNION CITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
