Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Reed v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2013cv02483
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, R Martinez, D Cartrette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLeod v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2013cv02353
Plaintiff:
Rodney Daniel McLeod
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, Charles Samuel, Jr and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv01866
Plaintiff:
David Lee Womack
Defendant:
David Berkebile, Patricia Rangel, Darren Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ranes v. Samuels et al
as 5:2013ct03164
Plaintiff:
Tom Ranes
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr., Dr. Davis, Dr. Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Wolters v. Samuels
as 3:2013cv01602
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wolters
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bernadel v. Stephens et al
as 2:2013cv02410
Plaintiff:
Mario Gerard Bernadel
Defendant:
D.R. Stephens, FCI - Memphis, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reed v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2013cv01579
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant:
M D Carvajal and Charles Samuels Jr, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wolters v. Samuels
as 3:2013cv01217
Petitioner:
Andrew Wolters
Respondent:
Charles Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Donald Ward v. Charles Samuel, Jr.
as 13-1533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD R. WARD and DONALD R. WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES SAMUEL, JR.
SCALA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv02381
Plaintiff:
JASON SCALA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES SAMUELS, JR., JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
