Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
State of Washington et al v. Tribal Court for Conf. Tribes & Bands of Yakama Nation et al
as 2:2012cv03152
Plaintiff:
State of Washington , Washington Department of Licensing , Christine Gregoire and others
Defendant:
Tribal Court for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Ted Strong and Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reed v. Fenske et al
as 2:2012cv01430
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reed
Defendant:
Brian Fenske, Marc Lewis, Darrell O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havard et al v. Detroit Entertainment, LLC.
as 2:2012cv13427
Defendant:
Detroit Entertainment, LLC
Plaintiff:
Andre Havard and Michigan, State of, Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Wage and Hour Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
118-122 MARKET STREET LLC v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA LIQOUR CONTROL BOARD et al
as 2:2012cv03836
Plaintiff:
118-122 MARKET STREET LLC
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA LIQOUR CONTROL BOARD and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Detroit Entertainment, LLC
as 2:2012cv12967
Defendant:
Detroit Entertainment, LLC
Plaintiff:
Angelo Smith and State of Michigan, Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Wage and Hour Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz v. City of Scranton Department of Licensing, Inspections & Permits
as 3:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
Mario Diaz
Defendant:
City of Scranton Department of Licensing, Inspections & Permits
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Abuan v. City of Fife, et al
as 3:2012cv05069
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Abuan
Defendant:
City of Fife , Washington State Department of Licensing and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pacquiao v. Mayweather et al
as 1:2011mc01116
Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather, Jr.
Respondent:
Floyd Mayweather, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Pacquiao
Movant:
Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
