Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Marmon Coal Co, et al v. Dir OWCP, US Dept Labor, et al
as 12-3388
Petitioner:
MARMON COAL CO and INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND MERCANTILE REASSURANCE CO
Respondent:
DIR OWCP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ETHEL D. ECKMAN, Widow of JOHN H. ECKMAN
LOGUE et al v. ECKMAN et al
as 5:2012cv03942
Plaintiff:
MARK LOGUE and LISA LOGUE
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. ECKMAN , BLACK THIUNDER POWERBOATS, INC. and GARELICK MFG. CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Eckman et al v. Blalack et al
as 1:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
Candice Eckman , Ashley Simpson and Kimberly Pero
Defendant:
Walter Blalack, Perry County, Tennessee and Perry County, Tennessee Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckman v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 3:2012cv00635
Plaintiff:
John Eckman
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Eckman v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eckman
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Governor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy Eckman v. Michael Martel
as 11-57254
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY CURTIS ECKMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL
Tommy Eckman v. Michael Martel
as 11-56739
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY CURTIS ECKMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL
ECKMAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50523
Plaintiff:
ERNEST E ECKMAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Ivy Eckman, et al v. Lancaster Cty, et al
as 11-2373
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IVY JO ECKMAN
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN SANCHEZ and ALTHEA SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCASTER CTY, JOSEPH GRAZCYK, POLICE OFFICER, C. LUCIANO, POLICE OFFICER and others
Ivy Eckman, et al v. Lancaster Cty, et al
as 11-2372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVY JO ECKMAN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADRIAN SANCHEZ and ALTHEA SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
LANCASTER CTY, JOSEPH GRAZCYK, POLICE OFFICER, C. LUCIANO, POLICE OFFICER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
