Cases 81 - 90 of 31,722
HERNANDEZ v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06380
Plaintiff:
MAURICIO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Ziboukh et al v. Whaleco Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03733
Defendant:
PDD Holdings Inc., WhaleCo Inc. doing business as Temu and Pinduoduo Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jehan Ziboukh, Margret Philie, Vera Figlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LOPEZ et al v. MALDONADO et al
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
ABEL CUELLAR LOPEZ, FELICHA NICOLE MARTINEZ, RYAN ANTHONY RAMIREZ and others
Defendant:
JUAN MALDONADO, CRIMSON ELIZONDO, RICHARD BOGDANSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Adams
Defendant:
Christine C. Hernandez, D. Scott Mitchell and Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. InterSafe Inc et al
as 4:2024cv03195
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miguel Hernandez doing business as Time Traveling Express Inc
Defendant:
InterSafe Inc, Northland Insurance Company and National Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Best
as 24-1411
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Garcia-Hernandez
as 24-40370
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Esteban Garcia-Hernandez
Delgado-Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3279
Petitioner:
JENNIFER JAZMIN DELGADO-HERNANDEZ and MADDYSON ARALBELLA MARROQUIN-DELGADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
