Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 273
Fields v. Huffman et al
as 4:2016cv00369
Plaintiff: Walter B Fields, Jr
Defendant: Scott Huffman, Terry Ropper, John Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prowse v. Faulkner County Detention Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00284
Plaintiff: Stansel Alexander Prowse
Defendant: Faulkner County Detention Center, John Randall and Scott Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Futch v. USA
as 16-12131
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. Huffman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00216
Plaintiff: Gaylon Wayne Jackson, Jr
Defendant: Scott Huffman and John Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bain v. Randall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00211
Plaintiff: John Martin Bain
Defendant: John Randall, Lacretia Flowers, Laticha McCree-Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Randall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00175
Plaintiff: Stanley Hunt
Defendant: John Randall, Lasker and Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Morrow, Jr. v. Tanya Morrow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-40455
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN RANDALL MORROW, JR.
Defendant - Appellant: TANYA MORROW
John Futch v. Myron Batt
as 16-10267
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Big Spring
Futch v. Nash
as 1:2016cv00175
Petitioner: John Randall Futch
Respondent: Cheron Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Futch v. Cheron Nash, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-50147
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent - Appellee: CHERON NASH, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Bastrop

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?