Cases 81 - 90 of 117
Frazier v. Carolyn Golson (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
Carolyn Golson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles , Cynthia Dillard , Eddie Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Police et al
as 3:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police, Sheriff Department and Public Defender Advocacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curry v. USA
as 5:2010cv01520
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Calvin Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Frazier v. Giles et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2010cv00707
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Police et al
as 3:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police, Public Defenders Advocacy and Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2010cv00496
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department, Sheriff Department and Public Defender's Advocacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Police et al
as 3:2010cv00449
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police, Sheriff's Department and Public Defenders Advocacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyler v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2010cv00066
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Tyler, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Police, et al
as 10-5529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CALVIN RODGERS FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE, LOUISVILLE METRO CORRECTIONS, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
