Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Key v. Zubowicz et al
as 1:2008cv02077
Plaintiff:
Fay Key
Defendant:
Vincent N. Zubowicz, John M. Griffin, Center for Plastic Surgery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Griffin v. Griffin
as 1:2008cv03323
Petitioner:
John A. Griffin and John A. Griffin
Respondent:
Tanya Griffin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John R. Griffin v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-63719
Plaintiff:
John R. Griffin
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
GRIFFIN v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv63719
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GRIFFIN and JOHN R. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Griffin v. Whitefield, Town of et al
as 1:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
John R. Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Whitefield, Town of, Richard Brown, Shawn White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SOLOMON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2007cv05075
Plaintiff:
MICAH A. SOLOMON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, SUSAN L. FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Griffin v. Francis
as 3:2007cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Lee Griffin
Defendant:
Joyce Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Griffin v. Whitefield, Town of et al
as 1:2007cv00243
Plaintiff:
John R. Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Whitefield, Town of, Richard Brown, Shawn White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv63430
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. GRIFFIN and LAVERNA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GRIFFIN V BERTINA
as 01-1399
Appellant:
JOHN H. GRIFFIN, JUDITH GREENGARD, JOHN H. GRIFFIN and others
Appellee:
PIETER H. REITSMA, ROGIER M. BERTINA, PIETER H. REITSMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
