Cases 81 - 90 of 128
Ellis v. Curtis et al
as 5:2016ct03215
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dane Ellis
Defendant:
Dr. Curtis, Mr. Anders, Miss Garett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Feather et al
as 3:2016cv01536
Defendant:
4B Staff, Baumeister, Feather and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlie Bells Jr. v. USP - Victorville et al
as 5:2016cv01598
Plaintiff:
Charlie Bells, Jr
Defendant:
Correctional Kitchen Staff, John Does, McCollough and others
Mark Jones v. Dr. Butler
as 16-6939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JACOB JONES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. BUTLER, M. D. and DR. GRAHAM, M. D.
Defendant:
WESTERN TIDEWATER REGIONAL JAIL, MEDICAL STAFF, FOOD KITCHEN STAFF and others
Bells v. USP - Victorville et al
as 5:2016cv00743
Plaintiff:
Charlie Bells, Jr
Defendant:
USP - Victorville, Shinn, McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Medical Staff et al
as 3:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Darnell Mitchell
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Dentist Staff and Kitchen Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2015cv81198
Plaintiff:
James Porter
Defendant:
Rick Bradshaw, Kitchen Staff and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracewell v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Walter Bruce Bracewell
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Henderson County Jail Mail Room and Henderson County Jail Kitchen Staff
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00327
Plaintiff:
Muhummad Abdul
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Medical Staff, Food Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisholm v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ronald Chisholm
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Medical Staff, Food Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
