Cases 81 - 90 of 125
Sandy et,al v The City of Terrell Texas et,al
as 3:2012cv04070
Plaintiff:
Lee Anne Sandy , Estate of Christopher Chadd Irwin , N R I and others
Defendant:
The City of Terrell Texas, Joe Hobbs, Guadalupe Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez, et al v. Nitro Lift Technologie
as 12-7057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIGUEL SANCHEZ, SHANE SCHNEIDER and EDDIE HOWARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
NITRO LIFT TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C.
Sanchez, et al v. Nitro Lift Technologie
as 12-7046
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIGUEL SANCHEZ, SHANE SCHNEIDER and EDDIE HOWARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
NITRO LIFT TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C.
Karl Wichelman, et al v. Santa Clara County, et al
as 12-16485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL WICHELMAN and ANNE SABETTA
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY, California, SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, AKA VMC, WILLIAM JENSEN, Administrative Law Judge, Dr. and others
Sanchez et al v. Nitro Lift Technologies, LLC
as 6:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Miguel Sanchez and Shane Schneider
Defendant:
Nitro Lift Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Greely et al v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jerry Greely , Ward Herring , Daniel Buttersworth and others
Defendant:
Lazer Spot, Inc. and Thomas Edwards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Miguel Sanchez et al
as 5:2011cv02026
Defendant:
Does, Bonnie Lindley, Maria Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
USA v. Miguel Sanchez
as 11-2849
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL SANCHEZ
United States of America v. Rivera (Rivera)
as 11-3119
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jorge Rivera, AKA G, AKA Pekino, William Mendez, Vincent Major, AKA Moe, AKA Moe-D and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Amador Rivera, Jr., AKA Beast
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
