Cases 81 - 90 of 153
Brickey v. Mrs. Clark et al
as 4:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Manuel Brickey
Defendant:
Mrs. Clark, Mr. Page, Mrs. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Thomas et al
as 5:2017ct03266
Plaintiff:
Farley L. Bernard
Defendant:
Eddie Thomas, Mr. Monroe, Jimmy D. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Daniels et al
as 5:2017ct03222
Plaintiff:
Quincy Jackson
Defendant:
D. Daniels, S. Fonville, Mr. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Meyer et al
as 3:2017cv00860
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton
Defendant:
Lt. Meyer, Sgt. Scro, Elijah B. Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Gregory, Jr. v. Dr. L. Levin
as 17-6407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES GREGORY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. L. LEVIN, Doctor, Haynesville Correctional Center and ISRAEL HAMILTON, Warden
Defendant:
CHARLES ALLEN, Warden, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Ali v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shakur Ali
Defendant:
Mr. Smith and Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Williams et al
as 4:2016cv03686
Petitioner:
Eddie Eugene Brewer
Defendant:
Betty J. Williams, Toni L. Deer, Vivian N. Elege and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Mr. Smith, Mr. Jones, Ms. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Rivera v. Bryan Stirling
as 16-7072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH SYNCERE RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth D. Rivera, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN STIRLING, Director, JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden, RYSHEMA DAVIS, Nutritionist IV and others
Lee v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Officer Pressley, Mrs. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
