Cases 81 - 90 of 242
Vierra v. McCowan
as 2:2019cv01523
Defendant:
Gregory R. McCowan, Greg McCowan and Gregory R. McCowan also known as Greg McCowan Doing business as McCowan Enterprises
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vierra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. McCowan
as 3:2019cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Oquendo Wright
Defendant:
T. McCowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent P. McCowan v. The State of California
as 2:2019cv06792
Petitioner:
Vincent P. McCowan
Respondent:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Material Witne:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rajah v. Clarke et al
as 7:2019cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Abdul-Rahman Rajah and Eric Valentino Rajah
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Clint Davis and T. McCowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Burch et al
as 2:2019cv02426
Defendant:
Charles E. Burch, II, Airreale McCowan, Unknown Heirs, Executors, Administrators, Devisees, Trustees, Legatees, Creditors, and Assignees of and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Zone Five, LLC et al v. Textron, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00393
Plaintiff:
BTICG Leasing, Inc., Jay Elliott, Tim Van Every and others
Defendant:
Textron Aviation, Inc. and Textron, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6933
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Bentley
as 19-6917
Defendant / Appellee:
FL. OFFICER LEWIS, HENRY PONTON, SERGEANT MEADE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Raymond McCowan v. Josie Gastelo
as 19-16195
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND B. MCCOWAN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSIE GASTELO, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
