Cases 81 - 90 of 4,723
Harp et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Colton Harp, Tamra Marie Harp, Ray Tillotson and others
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young S. Lee v. Antonio Miranda et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Young S. Lee
Defendant:
Antonio Miranda, Juan Garica and Does 1 to 10
MIRANDA v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MIRANDA
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Miranda v. Miami-Dade Cardiology Consultants, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21115
Plaintiff:
Sandra Miranda
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Cardiology Consultants, LLC and HCA Health Services of Miami, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Wojcik v. Saas et al
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joesph Wojcik
Defendant:
Robert Saas, Adam Leonetti, Israel Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz-Santiago v. Sanchez-Acosta, et al
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
RAY LEONERDIRT DIAZ-SANTIAGO and RAY LEONERDIRT DIAZ, II
Defendant:
JOSE SANCHEZ-ACOSTA, Attorney and MANUEL CIDRE-MIRANDA
Trejo Miranda v. Garland
as 24-9518
Petitioner:
JOEL TREJO MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
