Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 150
Trammell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hernando)
as 8:2018cv02141
Petitioner: Nicholas James Trammell
Respondent: Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEREMES v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2018cv00243
Defendant: JOHN J. TALABER and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS JAMES KEREMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KEREMES v. GOODRICH, GOODRICH & LAZZARA PC et al
as 2:2018cv01149
Defendant: GOODRICH, GOODRICH & LAZZARA PC and MATTHEW BRIANO
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS JAMES KEREMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KEREMES v. CAPRISTO et al
as 2:2018cv01051
Defendant: DARLENE SKOSNIK and CLAIR C. CAPRISTO
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS JAMES KEREMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jensen v. USA
as 1:2018cv02006
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Nicholas James Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Alexander v. Brown We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00510
Petitioner: Nicholas James Alexander
Respondent: Steve Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Queen v. USA - 2255
as 1:2018cv00699
Petitioner: Nicholas James Queen
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzales v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00107
Plaintiff: Nicholas James Gonzales
Defendant: New Mexico Corrections Department, New Mexico Corrections Department Health Services Bureau, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Queen v. Gift
as 8:2017cv01259
Plaintiff: Nicholas James Queen
Defendant: Ava I. Gift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. USA
as 8:2017cv00618
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Nicholas James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?