Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 144
Peter Tia v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 12-16910
Plaintiff - Appellant: PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee: NOLAN ESPINDA, STUART N. FUJIOKA, MICHAEL PARK and others
Nelson v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv02276
Plaintiff: Henry L Nelson
Defendant: Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board and Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FEINGOLD v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL et al
as 2:2012cv03516
Plaintiff: ALLEN FEINGOLD
Defendant: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PAUL KILLION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Espinda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00351
Plaintiff: Peter R. Tia
Defendant: Nolan Espinda, Stuart N. Fujioka, Michael Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Vickers
as 2:2012mc00085
Petitioner: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent: Jeremy T. Vickers
In Re Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bledsoe
as 2:2012mc00084
Petitioner: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent: Christopher B. Bledsoe
In re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Epperly
as 2:2012mc00029
Petitioner: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent: Donald J. Epperly
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith
as 2:2012mc00011
Petitioner: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent: Martin R. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Glick v. Molloy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2011cv00168
Plaintiff: Ronald D. Glick
Defendant: Donald W. Molloy, Jeremiah Lynch, Keith Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zamow
as 2:2011mc00112
Petitioner: Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Respondent: Thomas A. Zamow
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?