Cases 81 - 90 of 113
ROSEBERRY v. PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES et al
as 2:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ARDEN ROSEBERRY
Defendant:
PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES, THOR CATALOGNE, GOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledford v. Texas Prisoner Transport Service
as 5:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Luke Shane Ledford
Defendant:
Texas Prisoner Transport Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Osbourne et al
as 4:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Craig James
Defendant:
David Osbourne, Daviess Co. Detention Center, P.T.S. ILC Prisoner Transport Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ledford v. Texas Prisoner Transport Service
as 1:2014cv00466
Plaintiff:
Luke Shane Ledford
Defendant:
Texas Prisoner Transport Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BARBARO v. PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES et al
as 3:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
JOHN PATRICK BARBARO
Defendant:
PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES and Adams County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBARO v. PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES et al
as 2:2013cv06975
Plaintiff:
JOHN PATRICK BARBARO
Defendant:
PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anglin v. McLean County Board et al
as 1:2013cv01495
Plaintiff:
Phillip Anglin
Defendant:
McLean County Board, Mike Emery, Greg Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Prisoners Transportation Services of America, LLC
as 1:2013cv01435
Plaintiff:
James Shaw
Defendant:
Prisoners Transportation Services of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
