Cases 81 - 90 of 243
Rea v. Cooper et al
as 2:2018cv10014
Defendant:
Jessica R. Cooper, David Randall, Kenneth DeLano and others
Plaintiff:
Gino Robert Rea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. USA-2255
as 1:2017cv03580
Petitioner:
Vincent R. Cooper
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cooper v. Hull et al
as 2:2017cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael R Cooper
Defendant:
Lt Hull , Rumpel and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv02782
Plaintiff:
Craig R. Cooper
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vanessa Cooper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2017cv01580
Plaintiff:
Vanessa R Cooper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, A. Wachington-Adduci, Richard Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnnie Cooper v. USA
as 17-13900
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNIE R. COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alan Willis, et al v. Big Lots, Inc., et al
as 17-3871
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES HAUBIEL, II, TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, STEVEN S. FISHMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 ADDITIONAL SECURITY BENEFIT FUND and ALAN WILLIS
Amicus Curiae:
AMICI CURIAE LAW PROFESSORS AND FORMER SEC OFFICIALS, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AND FINANCIAL MARKETS ASSOCIATION (SIFMA) and U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MCNEIL et al v. HARVEY et al
as 1:2017cv01720
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MCNEIL, MICHAEL BEALS ELLIS, HAROLD R. STANLEY and others
Defendant:
G. MICHAEL HARVEY, DALE A. DROZD and CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01883
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
