Cases 81 - 90 of 118
US v. Rodriguez-Santana
as 12-2067
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEX S. RODRIGUEZ-SANTANA, a/k/a Puruco, a/k/a Indio, a/k/a Alex R. Santana
Rodriguez v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02922
Plaintiff:
Paul S. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. , Lowe's Companies, Inc. , Rexon Industrial Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01688
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodriguez et al v. Tranckino et al
as 4:2012cv02382
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo S. Rodriguez and Mark Duke
Defendant:
Barry Tranckino and Bold Energy II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Anaeme v. United States Of America
as 5:2012cv00486
Defendant:
Ricardo LNU, M. Carter, Solomon Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Viorel Muresan v. James J Rodriguez et al
as 2:2012cv04138
Plaintiff:
Viorel Muresan
Defendant:
James J Rodriguez, Marlene S Rodriguez and The Law Firm of Dennis P. Block and Associates
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03585
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, New York State Board of Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peoples v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peoples, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, M. Hodgas, K. Kostecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
as 2:2011cv58176
Plaintiff:
HIPOLITO S RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RODRIGUEZ v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58177
Plaintiff:
HIPOLITO S RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
