Cases 81 - 90 of 513
Meltech Corporation, Inc. v. Secretary of the Army
as 22-1659
Appellant:
MELTECH CORPORATION, INC.
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-3292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO and STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ASST. SECRETARY JO-ELLEN DARCY, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jason Sissel v. Christine Wormuth
as 22-5045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason L. Sissel
Defendant / Appellee:
Christine E. Wormuth, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army
Meade v. Secretary of the Army et al
as 6:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Meade
Defendant:
Secretary of the Army and Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ECC International Constructors, LLC v. Secretary of the Army
as 22-1368
Appellant:
ECC INTERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTORS, LLC
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
