Cases 81 - 90 of 189
AA Action Collection Co Inc v. Richard Dweck, et al
as 15-3663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AA ACTION COLLECTION CO INC, DBA Action Collection
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD DWECK, ACTION RECOVERY SERVICES CORP, DBA Action Financial Services and SAFE HOME PRODUCTS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
TD BANK NA
Third Party - Appellee:
TODD BANK and ACTION PROCESS & SUBPOENA CO INC
Dos Santos v. Telexelectric LLLP et al
as 4:2015cv13614
Plaintiff:
Rita Dos Santos
Defendant:
Telexelectric LLLP, Telex Mobile Holdings Incorporated, James M. Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dos Santos v. Telexelectric LLLP et al
as AZ/2:15-cv-01906
Plaintiff:
Rita Dos Santos
Defendant:
Telexelectric LLLP , Telex Mobile Holdings Incorporated , James M Merrill and others
Dos Santos v. Telexelectric LLLP et al
as 2:2015cv01906
Plaintiff:
Rita Dos Santos
Defendant:
Telexelectric LLLP, Telex Mobile Holdings Incorporated, James M Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. TD Bank, N.A.
as 6:2015cv03538
Petitioner:
Kendall Robinson
Respondent:
TD Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Cavacini, et al v. TD Bank NA
as 15-3017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES F. CAVACINI, JR. and KEVIN BASE
Defendant - Appellee:
TD BANK NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Oncology Associate
as 15-2484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN L FRANK LAW ASSOCIATES PC
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and TD BANK NA, Successor by merger to Commerce Bank, N.A.
Mudge, et al v. Bank of America
as 15-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN H. MUDGE, JR. and LISA S. MUDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
TD BANK NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
