Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 133
CHEROKEE NATION vs. NASH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01313
Plaintiff: CHEROKEE NATION
Defendant: RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Counter_claimant: RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Counter_defendant: CHEROKEE NATION, JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2 and others
Cross_claimant: RAYMOND NASH , LARRY WASSON , ROBERT ALLEN and others
Intervenor_defendant: MARILYN VANN , RONALD MOON , DONALD MOON and others
Cross_defendant: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cherokee Nation, et al v. Jewell, et al
as 13-5109
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE CHEROKEE NATION and CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL S. BLACK, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, KENNETH L. SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior and SALLY JEWELL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior
Defendant-Intervenor: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA
Brown v. Cherokee Nation Hastings Hospital
as 6:2013cv00364
Plaintiff: John T. Brown
Defendant: Cherokee Nation Hastings Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Cherokee Nation, et al v. Jewell, et al
as 13-5106
Plaintiff - Appellee: THE CHEROKEE NATION and CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant: KENNETH L. SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior and MICHAEL S. BLACK, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellant: UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA
Maldonado et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv02042
Plaintiff: Christinna Jane Maldonado , Samantha Danielle Lancaster and Jane Does 1-10
Defendant: Eric Holder, United States of America and Cherokee Nation, The
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act
Cherokee Nation v. Nash, et al
as 13-5078
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: CHEROKEE NATION
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE UNITED STATES
Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant - Appellee: RAYMOND NASH, LARRY WASSON, ROBERT ALLEN and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee: MARILYN VANN, RONALD MOON, DONALD MOON and others
Counter-Defendant - Appellee: BILL JOHN BAKER, S. JOE CRITTENDEN, REGISTRAR, JOHN DOE and others
Movant - Appellant: ROBIN MAYES
Rogers et al, The Cherokee Nation of Mexico And The Native American Church, et al vs. American Express Bank, FSB, AEFSB, et al
as 5:2013cv00463
Defendant: American Express Bank, FSB, AEFSB, American Express Centurion Bank, Kenneth L. Chenault and others
Plaintiff: Charles L. Rogers, The Ancient Cherokee Church of Mexico and The Cherokee Nation of Mexico And The Native American Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perryman v. Cherokee Nation Entertainment, LLC
as 4:2013cv00296
Plaintiff: James Perryman
Defendant: Cherokee Nation Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Mensch v. Cherokee Nation Emergency Medical Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00164
Plaintiff: Kelly Jo Mensch
Defendant: Cherokee Nation Emergency Medical Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Dwayne et al v. Sisson et al
as 7:2012cv00492
Plaintiff: All members for the Cherokee nation of Indians and the Cherrokees in America as in Haeres natus - Heir born, and natural heir, Madison Anne, Susan Annette and others
Defendant: Trevor Harris, Chris Heidt, Allan Klein and others
And All Under His Control: Mark Sisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?