Cases 81 - 90 of 7,923
Vasquez v. Ortega et al
as 5:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Isaias Vasquez
Defendant:
Jose Ortega, J. Thich, D. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vasquez v. Market Square et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Vasquez
Defendant:
Market Square and State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Vasquez v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Caroline Vasquez
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Vasquez v. New Mexico Department Of Corrections, et al
as 24-2058
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VASQUEZ
Defendant:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ALISHA TAFOYA-LUCERO, in her individual and official capacity, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS SERVANDO ACOSTA and others
Vasquez v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Alexander Vasquez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00742
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
