Cases 81 - 90 of 478
Sanders v. National Vision, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00759
Defendant:
National Vision, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HealthStar, LLC et al v. Dynamic Vision, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Axene Health Partners, LLC, Michael Gill, Dynamic Vision, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
HealthStar EVV, LLC and HealthStar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nationwide Vision Center, Inc. v. B.T.P. Vision Inc.
as 2:2018cv05421
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Vision Center, Inc.
Defendant:
B.T.P. Vision Inc. and B.T.P. Vision Inc. a New York corporation doing business as Nationwide Vision Center
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BullsEye Telecom, Inc. v. U.S. Vision, Inc.
as 2:2018cv12331
Defendant:
U.S. Vision, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BullsEye Telecom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rudden et al
as 1:2018cv01842
Defendant:
Financial Visions Inc., Volcano Fund, LLC, The, Velocity Fund, LLC and others
Interested Party:
USA
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Daniels v. Optel Group USA Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02120
Plaintiff:
Donnie Daniels
Defendant:
Optel Group USA Inc., Optel Vision, Inc. and Optel Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mikel v. Barnes et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Sheila Mikel
Defendant:
Omni Visions, Inc. , Bonnie Hommrich and Department of Children's Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blansett v. U.S. Vision, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01027
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Blansett
Defendant:
U.S. Vision, Inc. and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
