Cases 81 - 90 of 110
USA v. Willie Freeman
as 10-10012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIE EDWARD FREEMAN
Tubbs v. Patterson et al
as 2:2009cv02465
Petitioner:
Willie Edward Tubbs
Respondent:
Tony Patterson and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Bell
as 2:2009cv14135
Petitioner:
Willie Edwards
Respondent:
Thomas Bell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. James Edwards
as 09-41040
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIE EDWARDS
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Willie Edward Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
EASON et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85242
Plaintiff:
B. JEAN EASON, B. JEAN EASON, WILLIE EDWARD EASON and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Johnson v. Dir, TDCJ
as 4:2009cv00500
Petitioner:
Willie Edward Johnson
Respondent:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Willie Edwards v. Ben Curry, et al
as 09-16589
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, Warden, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
Johnson v. Dir, TDCJ
as 5:2009cv00106
Petitioner:
Willie Edward Johnson
Respondent:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
Dylam Holmes
Defendant:
United States of America, Fairview Park, Limited Partnership and Willie Edward Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
