Cases 81 - 90 of 238
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01221
Trustee:
J. Phillip Jones
Defendant:
Christopher C. McClure III, Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01220
Defendant:
Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Janice P. Brannen and James E. Brannen
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01194
Defendant:
Jack M. Rudolph, Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and Helen O. Young
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01145
Defendant:
Altra Federal Credit Union, Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Lorraine E. Neary and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01143
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., PRLAP, INC., Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01123
Defendant:
Courtney Maynard Caudill, Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and Nicklas R. Caudill
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
White v. Mow It Right, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02699
Defendant:
Melinda Fowler, Mow It Right, LLC and Chris Fowler
Plaintiff:
Dale White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
United State of America et al v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.38 Acre of Land, More Or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00969
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.38 Acre of Land, More Or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Peter M. Olson and Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
United State of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.21 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00968
Defendant:
Betty D. Maynard, James H. Maynard and An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.21 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Ware v. Tennessee Human Rights Commission et al
as 1:2018cv01193
Defendant:
Tennessee Human Rights Commission, Madison Place Apartments, Madison Realty and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Michelle Ware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
