Cases 81 - 90 of 100
John Anthony Williams v. Alonzo Thompson
as 24-6769
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GBI, Georgia Bureau Investigation, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS OF SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES PHONE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Fletcher v. Whitten et al
as 5:2024cv00692
Defendant:
Chris Mattingly, Securus Technologies, Mark Knutson and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Edward Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Securus Technologies
as 24-10517
Defendant:
Securus Technologies
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Defendant:
TDCJ Jordan Unit, Tammy Shelby, Aventiv Technologies and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harrison and Gregory Jay Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. The City of New York
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC REID
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, MARTHA W. KING, In their official and individual capacity, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR., In their official and individual capacity and others
Dixon v. Adanna et al
as 3:2024cv00960
Defendant:
Adanna and Securus Technologies
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Defendant:
John Doe, Securus Technologies and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farney v. Securus Technologies LLC
as 4:2024cv00469
Defendant:
Securus Technologies LLC
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Farney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
